Lee Elder

Joined

• started 158 topics
• posted 646 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Lee Elder

• 
  43

  How Many Witnesses Would Really Take Blood?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  up until the very end, my mother refused blood.

  it didn't matter if it was a blurred line or not, the bible says "no blood"!

  i wonder if she was in the minority, in her thinking.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  John Cedars survey is useful in this regard. Its going to vary with circumstance, age, the nature of the emergency, privacy/confidentiality, and perhaps most importantly the degree of commitment to the WT policy. There is a significant amount of non-compliance among younger JW's. Perhaps as much as 50%.
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Fisherman: The GB know what they need to do. At least some of them have in the recent past, just not 2/3 of them. I am not directing the GB to do anything, I'm not delusional. On the other hand, you may very well be deluding yourself about some of these issues. I would invite you to read the series of articles Dr. Muramoto wrote in the Journal of Medical Ethics to better grasp the ethical responsibilities physicians have, and the confusion that continues to exist in the medical community. Be sure to read the article written by the editor in this regard as well. Or stick with your delusion, its your choice.

  http://ajwrb.org/physicians
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Fisherman wrote: "You should know by now that doctrinal decisions are made by the GB, not by individual JW".

  Of course I know that. This fact, however, creates a paradox for the Watchtower because they do not want to give up control of anything they are not forced to give up. At the same time, they must endeavor to hide this fact from the medical and legal community. To some extent they have been successful in this regard. A large part of our focus is to help the medical and legal community understand that their is no free choice or informed consent present or even possible for a Jehovah's Witness. That there are "controls and sanctions" if a JW chooses to conscientiously accept a blood product the governing body haven't approved.
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Interesting conversation going here. Two things that jump out for me:

  1. The WT's argument that "Jehovah's Witnesses" don't accept blood transfusions can only be interpreted a couple of ways. The first is that each Jehovah's Witness has carefully studied the matter, and independently reached a conclusion that happens to mirror the bizarre policy currently in place. The second is that there is no independent analysis happening, and that the policy is an organizational one all Jehovah's Witnesses must adopt and maintain.

  This is a very important point from the the standpoint of medical ethics, as well as the law which requires the presence of informed consent. The problem the organization has is they want to have their cake and eat it too. Of course that is not possible, but they try nonetheless.

  Oddly enough, from this perspective, their policy on blood fractions actually works because it allows individual Jehovah's Witnesses to reach different conclusions, and does not insist on the presence of "unity". However, the whole thing teeters and falls apart when the so called "formed elements" are involved. Here there clearly is "organizational policy" in place. There is no room for individual conscience, or informed consent. Why? Because the organization tries to enforce compliance via undue influence, i.e. coercion, manipulation, implanting of phobias, publishing of old and misleading data, shunning, etc, etc.

  2. The notion that the blood transfusion ban somehow gave Jehovah's Witnesses special protection from AIDS is beyond ridiculous. The vast majority of AIDS transmission occurred via plasma derivatives, particularly the clotting factors. They are derived from very large pools of plasma donations, and expose the average hemophiliac the blood of hundreds or thousands of different donors every year. Plasma derivatives have had the Governing Body's blessing since the mid 70's.
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Sure, but context is very clear that it is the "eating of blood" under discussion. GB has to demonstrate that the use of blood products is the equivalent of "eating" blood. They have never done that. Bible is silent on blood products/fractions/elements. Once the JW understands these points it becomes clear its nothing more than a non-scriptural "organizational" policy.
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Fisherman: We've managed to open the minds of many JW's simply by asking the question: "Where in the Bible does it explain which parts of blood are OK and which parts are not"?
  
• 
  42

  U.K. NHS Attitude to Blood Transfusion and its Safety

  by BluesBrother in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  while visiting someone at the local hospital i saw this leaflet " will i need a blood transfusion ?

  - patient information" .

  now i was raised in the belief that doctors are transfusion-happy and just give you one willy nilly if they operate , further that a trans.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  Perhaps a better question to ask is what is a blood transfusion? JW's will say they don't accept blood, but in reality they are now using 100% of blood in fractionated form. What is it that makes albumin, hemoglobin, cryoprecipitate, etc, acceptable for a JW, beyond the HLC and GB saying so? Why are these major blood products acceptable, and others, even tiny ones likes platelets, not acceptable? Where does the Bible explain which parts of blood may be used, and which parts may not? Of course, these are rhetorical questions. The Bible is silent. There is no logical reason for the Watchtower's convoluted policy beyond it being an "organizational policy".
  
• 
  1

  Child Sacrifice among Jehovah's Witnesses

  by Lee Elder in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  this updated article at ajwrb explores some of the roots of child sacrifice that the watchtower essentially encourages jehovah's witness parents to observe.

  .

  http://ajwrb.org/watchtower-sacrificial-lambs.

  1. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  This updated article at AJWRB explores some of the roots of child sacrifice that the Watchtower essentially encourages Jehovah's Witness parents to observe.

  http://ajwrb.org/watchtower-sacrificial-lambs
  
• 
  14

  October 1, 1914 -- October 1, 2017

  by Alfred in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  “october 1, 1914, on taking his place at the breakfast table in the brooklyn bethel dining-room, he in a strong voice denoting conviction announced: “the gentile times have ended!” “ – watchtower july 15, 1950 page 216 paragraph 1. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  The Watchtower has had "its day", and stands at the head of the false prophet line in my view.
  
• 
  19

  Are White Blood Cells Passed to a Baby via Breastfeeding?

  by ThomasCovenant in

  1. watchtower
  2. medical

  having just read ''just n from bethel''s post http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/198904/1/those-that-just-one-day-were-not-there-anymore .

  i have to ask is it true that white blood cells are passed to a baby when breastfeeding?

  if it is true then surely jw's cannot breastfeed..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Lee Elder

  They have no response. It is one of many issues that have repeatedly been inquired about by JW elders and HLC members. The leadership's response: "Wait on Jehovah".